Saturday, April 12, 2008

The first warm day

Here's what it's like on a warm weekend day in San Francisco -- hundreds of people sprawl on the grass in Dolores Park. I've never understood the appeal of sprawling on the grass in the sun, so I wasn't there. In fact, I consider it a success if I manage to avoid going out in the sun at all.

I was home doing nothing much at all besides listening to the ballgame and cleaning, looking forward to going out in the evening. I had a table reserved at an al fresco restaurant on the city's famous Belden Alley on one of the few warm nights of the year. (There are always only a few.) But it was not to be. Cris wasn't feeling up to going out, and neither was the guest of honor, a friend's mother visiting from France. So I canceled the reservation and will stick around the house, where it is quite warm.

Recently I've been reading Joan Didion -- first a few pieces from Slouching Toward Bethlehem, and then the novel The Last Thing He Wanted. And I've been amazed at how much I don't like the writing, because I used to think Slouching Toward Bethlehem was brilliance incarnate. Now it just looks impossibly mannered and almost precious.

This is from one of the most famous pieces in the book, an essay titled "On Morality":
 

At midnight last night, on the road in from Las Vegas to Death Valley Junction, a car hit a shoulder and turned over. The driver, very young and apparently drunk, was killed instantly. His girl was found alive but bleeding internally, deep in shock.

I actually like the casual reference to "his girl." You could say that in the 1960s. The term encompasses all the possibilities without specifically defining the relationship of the "very young" driver and "his girl," but "his girl" she was.

I talked this afternoon to the nurse who had driven the girl to the nearest doctor, 185 miles across the floor of the Valley and three ranges of lethal mountain road. The nurse explained that her husband, a talc miner, had stayed on the highway with the boy's body until the coroner could get over the mountains from Bishop, at dawn today. "You can't just leave a body on the highway," she said. "It's immoral."

There's an odd mixture of vagueness and specificity here. The location of the hospital is not described, but the base of the coroner is. The hospital, wherever it was, was exactly 185 miles away, not 180 or 200, but the scene of the accident was "three hours" from the town of Bishop.

It was one instance in which I did not distrust the word, because she meant something quite specific.

The writer puts herself in the position of going around trusting or mistrusting others' use of words, implying that she is possessed not only of a magisterial quality of wisdom and taste, but that others' misuse of language consistently disappoints her.

She meant that if a body is left alone for even a few minutes on the desert, the coyotes close in and eat the flesh.

Here she is being specific again, as if it were a virtue, but she's really just trying to shock.

Whether or not a corpse is torn apart by coyotes may seem only a sentimental consideration, but of course it is more: one of the promises we make to one another is that we will try to retrieve our casualties, try not to abandon our dead to the coyotes.

She really likes the word "coyotes," and also the pretentious phrase "of course," which she will use a few sentences later. Then there's the tendentious "the promises we make to one another," which sounds like something out of a John Kerry speech.

If we have been taught to keep our promises -- if, in the simplest terms...

Now she's going to suspend the Ivy League phrasing for a moment, because it's actually not useful when you want to say something plainly.

... our upbringing is good enough -- we stay with the body, or we have bad dreams.

Here's the repeated use of the word "we," which is the height of pretension, more than any exalted phrasing or two-dollar words. She doesn't mean the royal "we," she means "we Americans," or at least, "we Americans whose upbringing is good enough." But the more you read, the more you are convinced that no one's upbringing could possibly be good enough when Didion is listening and passing judgment.

I am talking, of course, about the kind of social code...

Oh for Christ's sake, shut up.

... that is sometimes called, usually pejoratively, "wagon-train morality."

Coming from someone who sounds pejorative almost all the time, that's believable.

In fact that is precisely what it is. For better or worse, we are what we learned as children...

No, really, shut up.

When I was in my 20s I loved this piece. I don't know what was wrong with me.

technorati:

1 comment:

doloresflores_d said...

In defense of preciousness--all great writers--shakespeare to norman mailer (who drives me nuts on a personal level--but could write) to david foster wallace choose not the easiest way to say things but the way that scratches your skin, and hopefully draws blood. Didion has this quality too.

Also, I wonder about you saying "false" gravitas. as i understand, didion has been in a mental hospital and has a "fragile" mental state even on good days. is her way of seeing the world false...or just different than your own?

I also wish you didn't descend into the "ivy league" snark which reminds me of the past election cycle. I'll tell you right off I've never been on an ivy league campus in my life (except harvard square once as a tourist)...but this doesn't mean I resent by default anyone who has. or that I hold up the sarah palins of the world as in any way superior for being "just folks." The anti-snobbery snobbery is becoming an ugly marker of our current culture.

As for the coyotes statement, I thought it referred to the way that she had been raised (in a conservative way) to be obligated to others...and the thought of being left to be devoured struck her as a radical symbol of broken human bonds...and even, yes, a radical crumbling of social contracts. Broken human bonds and social contracts are the subject of many of her essays...

i always think its interesting when we decide we no longer like writers that we once did. I discovered didion just a few years ago and I'm in my 30's so I think my love of her writing is pure of wanting to fit in with any of my friends or cohorts...but I did get rid of a whole stack of beat writers a few years ago when I decided as a feminist I could not stand to re-read the way they write about women. Funny...that was a few years ago and I can feel myself growing a little more tender and more tolerant toward old jack keroac now...maybe we just "need" writers in different ways in different stages of our lives? maybe you will be able to feel more tenderly again toward didion one day...or maybe not. Funny how we humans are...sometimes frighteningly free of social contracts or obligations to writers whose words we once loved...